You’re never too young – kids caring about sharks, part one

Filed Under (Sharks, Special Events, Summer Sharktakular 2010, conservation) by Alexa & Cindy on 22-07-2010

Tagged Under : , , ,

You’re never too young to start caring about sharks.

We’d like to introduce you to Alexa’s cousin,  Avery Jean. She’s four, and is learning about the ocean in her preschool class. She made a poster for Sharktakular to express her feelings.

“I love all ocean animals, and sharks bring balance to aquatic life,” Avery say. ”They’re very important and I don’t want them to die.”

Her poster reads “I love sharks. Don’t FINish them.”

We sense a deputy O4E editor is now being groomed! ;-)

Just goes to show you, you’re never too young to start caring about – and helping – sharks. We’ll have more on the latter in part two with a guest post by Robin Culler, teacher and captain of Oceana’s 2010 Junior Ocean Hero winners, The Shark Finatics

Have a SHARKTAKULAR evening!

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

SociBook del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

David Shiffman on The Goal: part two of a three part series on shark conservation

Filed Under (Sharks, Special Events, Summer Sharktakular 2010, conservation) by Alexa & Cindy on 22-07-2010

Tagged Under : , ,

Today, David Shiffman puts forth his take on where we go from here to turn the tide on practices that put shark populations at risk, including finning, bycatch and David’s personal roadmap for how to help sharks. 

By WhySharksMatter

It’s easy to become discouraged when considering the enormity of the problem, but we must not give up. We must focus on the goal, and work towards it!

To paraphrase an old joke about my fellow Jews, if you ask three conservationists what their goal is, you’ll likely get four answers. This post is about my goal, which isn’t necessarily the goal of the entire save the sharks movement. I expect that many of my conservationist friends will disagree with parts of it, and I look forward to a lively discussion.

We know from The Problem that sharks are being harvested (or killed accidentally as bycatch) at wildly unsustainable rates. This needs to stop, and sharks need some strong legal protections.

The form that these legal protections will take is the subject of much debate. A (very) few countries like Palau make fishing for sharks in any form illegal in their territorial waters. Hawaii now bans the selling, purchasing, or possession of shark fins within state boundaries. U.S. fisheries management policy presently makes it illegal to kill some species of shark and sets size limits on some other species. However, most countries have no legal protection at all for sharks, and the number of species with worldwide protection (at least on paper, since these are difficult to enforce in the middle of the ocean) can be counted on one hand.

Though this may shock some of my readers, I do not think that global shark conservation policy needs to be as extreme as Palau’s “you can’t kill any sharks ever” law. I do not object to the sustainable harvest of sharks for food. Sustainably harvesting animals that have so few young so late in life is extremely difficult, and most times that it has been tried, the fishery has collapsed within a few decades. That doesn’t mean that it is impossible and it doesn’t mean that we should ban all shark fishing. However, for me to be satisfied, the world of commercial fishing is going to need to undergo some drastic changes.

The goal for finning

While I can accept sustainable fishing for some shark meat, I object to the shark fin soup fishery. In most parts of the world, this fishery is brutal, wasteful, and unsustainable. Sharks of any species and size have their fins cut off, and the rest of the animal is dumped overboard to bleed to death or drown- all to provide texture to a delicacy for the rich. The few countries that have shark finning policies have different strategies to manage it.

Some, like Canada, require that fishermen land the rest of the shark and not just the fins (not attached to each other), and they enforce this by weighing total fins and total shark carcasses. This is silly, because different shark species can have a drastically different fin-to-body weight ratio. Other countries require that fishermen land sharks with the fins still attached, which is better and is starting to become the standard. It still allows finning, however.

I would feel differently about shark finning if it provided a staple food item for the world’s poor instead of a delicacy for the rich. I would feel differently about shark finning if the shark’s meat was used, instead of just cartilage for texture. I would feel differently if fishermen targeted only certain species of a certain size instead of every shark they find. As it stands, though, my goal for the shark finning fishery is its complete abolition.

The goal for bycatch

The threat sharks face from bycatch is harder to regulate. In some cases, simple gear modifications can minimize the amount of sharks caught without greatly influencing the catch of target species. In other cases, simply placing gear in slightly different locations or depths can greatly reduce the number of sharks caught accidentally. Some of these changes have been made already, most have not been. Conservationists who fight for long-term large-scale goals should sometimes fight for easy fixes that will still make a lot of difference. My goal is for every single known and feasible bycatch reduction strategy to be implemented. This won’t eliminate bycatch, but it will reduce it significantly.

Some fishing gear is so destructive (to sharks and many other ocean animals) that simple fixes just won’t help. In these cases, my goal is for that gear to be banned entirely. This is not unprecedented- the U.N. banned large drift nets almost 20 years ago because of the huge amount of bycatch they caused.

The goal for marine protected areas

While I don’t think that we need a global ban on shark fishing modeled after Palau’s policy, some small-scale areas where shark fishing is banned would be very helpful. Research performed on a marine protected area in Belize has shown that many species of shark remain in a small area for much of their lives, showing that a small region where shark fishing is illegal can have an effect. However, some species, like the Great White shark, can swim thousands of miles in a year and wouldn’t stay in a small protected area very long. Although they won’t help all shark species, marine protected areas will protect many. My goal is a large worldwide network of marine protected areas that protect sharks and other marine animals.

My goal for fishermen

The global commercial fisheries industry is at a crossroads. There are too many fisherman chasing too few fish, and overfishing is rampant. However, contrary to the claims and insinuations of some conservationists, fishermen are not evil people trying to destroy the environment. They are hardworking people who are just trying to provide for their families, and they are correct when the point out that most policies that will protect marine life will harm them financially. However, if nothing is done, there will be no fish to catch and fishermen will be harmed financially anyway. My goal is for there to be fewer commercial fishing vessels and a much lower global catch, and I am open to suggestions on how to help the fishermen that this policy would negatively impact.

My goal

My goal is for an end to unsustainable shark fishing, a ban on the shark fin soup fishery, the implementation of bycatch reduction policies, a global network of marine protected areas, and some form of incentive or regulation to encourage fishermen to catch fewer fish overall. Some parts of this goal would be more effective for protecting sharks than others. Some are more achievable than others. I believe that all are worth fighting for.
~WhySharksMatter

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

SociBook del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

Oceana’s Q&A with Shark Biologist Michelle McComb

Filed Under (Sharks, Special Events, Summer Sharktakular 2010, conservation) by Alexa & Cindy on 21-07-2010

Tagged Under : , ,

Hello, Sharktakular readers!

I’m Emily Fisher, online editor at the ocean conservation organization Oceana, and I wanted to share with you one of my favorite things from our website so far this year — and it happens to be about sharks.

I interviewed shark biologist Michelle McComb of Florida Atlantic University for the latest issue of our magazine. She made big news late last year for her work on a study that begins to answer a fundamental question: why are hammerhead sharks shaped the way they are?

McComb and her fellow researchers found surprising results about hammerhead vision. (And I learned a million-dollar word — a hammerhead’s funny head shape is known scientifically as a “cephalofoil.”)

EF: What did you and your colleagues discover about hammerhead vision?

MM: The popular literature is filled with claims that hammerheads have better vision, but this was never tested. Our goal was to quantify the extent of the visual fields of hammerhead sharks in contrast to more typical-shaped sharks, in order to determine if they possessed binocular vision.

What we found was a surprise – hammerhead sharks do have binocular vision, and even more surprising, the extent of binocular overlaps was greater than found in the typical-shaped sharks.

When we originally discussed this project we thought we were setting out to dispel the myth that hammerheads possessed binocular vision. We had no idea that hammerheads would have even larger binocular overlaps than normal sharks! 

EF: Why is it significant that hammerheads have binocular vision?

MM: Binocular vision evolved to facilitate depth perception. Each eye sees a slightly different image and it’s the subtle differences within these images that are used for depth cues. So the wider separation of the eyes in hammerhead sharks enhances the stereoscopic effect and depth perception. This translates into a visual advantage for a predator like the hammerhead shark in its ability to accurately judge the distance of moving objects like prey.

EF: As a result of your team’s research, do we have a definitive answer for why hammerhead shark heads are shaped the way they are?

MM: Our results support the idea that vision may have played a role in the evolution of the hammerhead. However, there are several other hypotheses that remain, some of which are untested.

It is possible that several factors in combination may have led to the evolution of the head shape, including the following hypotheses:

1. The head acts as a bow plane to provide hydrodynamic lift during swimming.

2. Possible enhanced electrosensory ability due to the larger size of the head and the potential for possession of more electrosensors in the head.

3. Enhanced olfactory ability due to the wide separation of the olfactory organs and naris (nostrils) on the head.

4. The head shape may help hammerheads pin down prey items like stingrays. However, this is not strongly supported because the diet of many hammerhead species (there are 8 species of hammerhead) does not include stingrays.

EF: The media response to your research was huge.  Why do you think people were so interested in it? What do you hope people came away with after reading about it?

MM: I think people enjoy sharks because they are mysterious and there is so much about them we still do not know.  I hope people understand that hammerheads are the most recently evolved sharks in the ocean and we have demonstrated that their visual abilities have been enhanced as a result of their strange expanded head.

EF: Have you ever swum with sharks? If not, do you want to?

MM: I have had the pleasure of travelling to a lot of different countries over the world and I have had the privilege of swimming with many sharks species.  I have swam with great white shark off the coast of South Africa, bull sharks in Australia, hammerheads in Hawaii, lemon sharks in Florida, and Caribbean reef sharks in the Bahamas.  Every time I see a shark while I am in the water I get a thrill and I feel so lucky and humbled that I am sharing space with them.

EF: What do you think is the biggest problem facing sharks today? Why is it important for humans to protect them?

MM: The cruel and wasteful practice of shark finning is the biggest threat to shark populations worldwide.  Over 100 million sharks are killed each year for their fins which are dried and used to make shark fin soup, a flavorless broth, which is an Asian delicacy and status symbol.

This overharvest is unsustainable since sharks reproduce and grow slowly. The oceans are vital to life on our planet and sharks have been in the oceans for 400 million years, playing a pivotal role in ecosystem balance. 

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

SociBook del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon